By Neil Thomas and Lobsang Tsering
The Stakes: Where Is Xi Steering China?
The year 2026 will mark an important moment on Beijing’s political calendar. It will be the year China releases and begins implementing the 15th Five-Year Plan, for 2026–2030 — a blueprint that will determine how resources are allocated, how industries are supported, and how economic activity is guided for the rest of the decade. It will also be the political runway to the 21st Party Congress in 2027, the moment when Xi Jinping will present himself once again as the indispensable architect of China’s future.
These milestones matter because, following the 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi has now succeeded in extending his tenure beyond the established norms of recent Chinese political history, making this plan the clearest marker yet of whether his model of centralized governance can sustain economic momentum and political legitimacy. The 13th Five-Year Plan was mapped out in 2015, just three years into Xi’s tenure, while the 14th Five-Year Plan was drafted in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The policy context is arguably now even more challenging. Growth has slowed, the property sector remains fragile, and local governments face heavy debt burdens. Demographic decline is accelerating, with fewer births and a shrinking workforce. Internationally, Beijing is grappling with protectionist trade and investment measures from the United States and Europe, while relations with Washington are being managed through rolling tariff truces rather than durable resolutions and substantive understandings.
This question is therefore pressing in 2026: Can Xi’s personal priorities — Communist Party control, national security, and technological self-reliance — be reconciled with the demands of growth, people’s livelihoods, and external stability? Or will contradictions between control and business confidence, and between security and innovation, become more visible and more difficult to manage?
Core Dilemma: What the Leader Wants Versus What the Country Needs?
Xi’s vision for China is clear: The Party must remain dominant, national security should inform every decision, and technological supremacy must provide the foundation for future prosperity. Yet these priorities, taken together, produce tensions that are increasingly difficult to resolve.
The control imperative has led Xi to centralize authority and enforce strict Party oversight. Since 2012, anti-corruption campaigns and institutional reforms have elevated loyalty relative to competence. This has secured Xi’s dominance but limited bureaucratic initiative. Officials hesitate to experiment for fear of missteps, leading to a slowdown in bureaucratic innovation and local adaptation. The very discipline that secures Xi’s position limits the dynamism of the system.
The security imperative has grown more pronounced in recent years. The 2024 revision of the State Secrets Law broadened the definition of what counts as sensitive information. The Counter-Espionage Law has been enforced aggressively against foreign firms and their executives, creating uncertainty for normal business practices. Xi has extended the logic of “comprehensive national security” to domains as varied as food, energy, cyberspace, and ideology. From the Party’s perspective, this reduces vulnerability. From the perspective of Chinese and foreign businesses, it creates risk and uncertainty.
The technology imperative — Xi’s drive for self-reliance through “new quality productive forces” — is central to his vision, but it risks creating distortions. Heavy investment and corporate guidance toward industrial upgrading can crowd out efforts to enhance consumption, address local government debt, and advance fiscal reform. By privileging technology and industrial capacity over consumers and markets, Xi may undermine the structural sustainability of growth. Ironically, this imbalance threatens the very imperatives that Xi values most — political control and national security — since low incomes and scarce jobs could spill into social discontent and weaken China’s ability to sustain geopolitical competition.
The contradiction is clearest in property and trade. Local governments need revenue from land sales, but the property downturn persists and jeopardizes fiscal sustainability. Foreign markets are needed to absorb overcapacity in electric vehicles and solar, yet subsidies provoke countermeasures and growing tensions abroad. Xi wants order and growth simultaneously, but the tools he uses to achieve one can undermine the other.
Outlook for 2026
In 2026, Xi will double down on his priority domains — Party control, national security, and technological self-reliance. These themes will shape the direction of the 15th Five-Year Plan and the political choreography leading up to the 21st Party Congress in 2027.
The control imperative will dominate elite politics. Xi’s overriding priority is to secure a team that can both implement his agenda and demonstrate absolute political reliability. Personnel reshuffles and vetting processes will focus on loyalty, then capability, with rising officials drawn from those who have proven themselves in priority areas such as national security, strategic industries, and defusing systemic risks. Xi will also try to keep others off balance, playing political groups against each other and reinforcing his role as the ultimate decision-maker. The emphasis on Party discipline and ideological conformity will see a continued drumbeat of purges aimed at senior officials, including those promoted during Xi’s tenure, though not his closest allies whom he has known for several decades. Beijing will keep investing more in the domestic security apparatus to maintain social stability and suppress large-scale protest.
On the policy front, Xi will continue tight security, expand strategic guidance of the private economy, and channel state resources into strategic technologies, and centrally run regional development projects. “Building a modernized industrial system” and “self-reliance and self-strengthening in science and technology” will be the key themes of the 15th Five-Year Plan, with increased emphasis on advanced manufacturing, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology. Xi wants to dominate global supply chains and close the technological gap with the United States so that China gains a stronger hand in international geopolitical competition.
Economic pragmatism will surface when growth targets and social stability come under threat. Measures to contain local government debt, absorb unsold housing, maintain employment, and boost demand will be implemented, albeit in piecemeal fashion. Yet Xi will resist deeper reforms that might empower households or reduce Party control, such as large-scale central-local reforms, significant expansions of the social safety net, or liberalization of the private sector. Fiscal stimulus will be deployed to rescue the economy from shocks like domestic downturns or global recessions. The result will be incremental gains in favored areas of control, security, and technology — but stagnation or drift elsewhere, with underlying contradictions remaining.
Conditions and Contingencies
Political dominance. Xi’s personal authority must remain strong. At present, purges and institutional reforms ensure his supremacy, but elite dynamics always carry risk. Health issues or heightened discontent among Xi’s allies ahead of the 2027 Congress, while unlikely, could alter the calculations.
Financial stability. Local government debt is the most immediate vulnerability, especially as it runs the risk of Party cadres and civil servants going unpaid. Estimates place hidden liabilities at 90–110 trillion yuan (USD 12–15 trillion). The debt-swap program launched in 2024 has provided temporary relief, but unexpected defaults or fiscal black holes could force Beijing into emergency measures, narrowing policy options.
External containment. Rivalry with Washington and the West must remain somewhat bounded. The truce reached at the Trump-Xi summit in Busan provides breathing space, but if U.S. domestic politics triggers a snapback to high tariffs and sweeping export controls, Beijing’s short-term economic outlook would become more challenging.
Policy coherence. Central promises must be implemented locally. For example, the 2025 Private Economy Promotion Law aims to reassure entrepreneurs, but its credibility depends on local officials. If cadres continue to harass, overtax, and go into arrears with private firms, confidence will not return, undermining progress.
Social stability. Rising unemployment or protests by homebuyers over unfinished properties could trigger harsh crackdowns. If these remain isolated, the system will hold. If they spread, Xi may feel compelled to tighten control even further.
These conditions are not guaranteed. Their fragility explains why Xi’s system is stable but can be slow in a crisis: Order can be maintained, but shocks may push the system toward either harsher centralization or reluctant adjustment, with the balance between the two sometimes proving unpredictable.
What to Watch
Personnel moves. Elite reshuffles during the run-up to the 2027 Party Congress will continue to reinforce Xi’s emphasis on loyalty and service. Promotions are likely to favor officials with connections to himself and his inner circle (including the current Politburo Standing Committee). Conversely, if Xi’s dominance slips, we could see demotions for close Xi loyalists, promotions for officials who were close to former leaders such as Hu Jintao and Li Keqiang, and more open contestation for control between sub-factions of Xi loyalists.
Rhetorical cues. State media will continue to use “triple personally” (san ge qinzi) formulations (personally planned, personally instructed, personally implemented; qinzi mouhua, qinzi bushu, qinzi tuidong) to underscore Xi’s central role in major initiatives. Frequent repetition of slogans such as “new quality productive forces” and “comprehensive national security” in Politburo readouts and People’s Daily editorials would confirm that Xi’s core priorities remain firmly in place.
Central-local dynamics. Signs of tension between Beijing and provincial governments will emerge around fiscal burdens and regulatory mandates. Local officials, already constrained by debt and shrinking land-sale revenue, may quietly resist costly central directives. Uneven implementation of consumption subsidies, housing conversions, or environmental targets is possible. Open defiance is unlikely but rising internal concerns are.
Regulatory enforcement. New restrictions or investigations targeting sectors deemed politically risky — data services, political consultancies, sensitive manufacturing sectors — would reinforce the securitized policy environment.
Policy delivery. While Beijing may announce reforms in consumption, housing, or taxation, the rollout will likely be limited and underfunded. Ambitious, comprehensive, and well-financed reforms in these domains would be a surprise; partial or incremental measures would be consistent with the forecast.
Alternative Scenarios
Baseline (most likely): Steady as Xi goes. The most likely outcome is that Xi sustains his strategic focus on Party control, national security, and technological self-reliance. Elite politics remain tightly managed during the run-up to the 2027 Party Congress. The economy muddles through with property triage preventing crisis, targeted subsidies stabilizing employment concerns, and local debt being rolled over and supported by central transfers. Growth will remain difficult, but will get close to targets and avoid contraction. This scenario assumes that Xi’s health holds, U.S.- China competition stays bounded, and local government finances do not collapse.
Alternative 1 (less likely): Pressure-induced reform and delegation. If economic pressures intensify — for example, if stock markets crash, housing prices disintegrate, or tariff truces collapse — Xi may be forced to inject more pragmatism into economic policy to keep his dream of national rejuvenation alive. This could include empowering technocrats to design more comprehensive fiscal reforms, expanding social safety nets, or finally exploring direct consumer stimulus. It might also push Xi to allow a greater role in elite politics for economic managers who can stabilize investor confidence. This path assumes that Xi can adjust tactically when stability is at stake, even if doing so means slowing his ideological and geopolitical agendas.
Alternative 2 (least likely): Shock-driven disruption. A major shock could upend Chinese politics. This might take the form of a sudden health issue for Xi, a military escalation in the Taiwan Strait, or a crisis in the South China Sea. Such an event could create a crisis of confidence in the leadership, accelerate succession jockeying within the Party, or push policy toward emergency mobilization. Any of these situations would create uncertainty far beyond the baseline. This wildcard scenario highlights what the forecast assumes away: that Xi’s personal dominance and the external environment remain relatively stable.
Strategic Implications
Provinces will be tasked with executing complex initiatives — housing conversions, industrial upgrades, unified markets — without much flexibility. Campaign-style governance will enforce compliance, but this risks inefficiency and overreach. Structural challenges — weak consumption, high local debt, demographic decline—will be met with incremental rather than transformative measures. Private-sector recovery will remain uneven as firms operate under political uncertainty and regulatory risk. Stability will be preserved, but at the cost of dynamism.
Regarding U.S.-China relations, Xi’s tactical focus will be on dealmaking with Donald Trump, but his strategic focus will remain fixed on ensuring that China becomes more strategically independent of the United States. The baseline forecast suggests that tariff truces and structured dialogues will continue, but cooperation on tech, global governance, and international conflicts will remain rare. Mutual suspicion will endure, and the political space for compromise will remain fragile and limited.
Abroad, China’s diplomatic weight will continue to grow, particularly in the Global South. Beijing will lean into its growing “neighborhood first” approach to diplomacy. Infrastructure, trade deals, and investment will anchor China’s role in Southeast Asia and beyond. This outreach will serve both economic and geopolitical goals, absorbing capacity and building alliances against Western pressure. In multilateral forums, China will project ambition, given Trump’s “America First” policy, but will proceed cautiously in substance, wary of committing economic resources that may be needed at home.
Policy Shaping and Conclusion
Xi Jinping’s governance model — anchored in Party control, national security, and technological self-reliance—will continue to dominate China’s trajectory in 2026. This centralized approach will provide political stability and policy continuity, but will leave the system vulnerable to bureaucratic inertia, internal shocks, and structural challenges. The tension between control and adaptability will define China’s domestic evolution and its international behavior.
China’s system is likely to remain stable. Effective policy toward Beijing will require balancing firmness with foresight — deterring coercive actions while sustaining engagement where it serves shared interests. For policymakers overseas, engagement should be pragmatic, selective, and risk-aware. First, cooperation should be prioritized in functional, less politically sensitive domains where mutual benefit is clear, such as healthcare delivery, financial regulation, and environmental governance. Second, economic resilience should be strengthened by diversifying supply chains and reducing critical dependencies. Third, policymakers should use diplomatic, economic, and military means to deter external escalation, while investing in steady channels of communication to reduce the chance of misunderstandings — and in “inside-out” monitoring to anticipate risks and openings.
 | A guest post by
|